Celebrities and Politics: Match Made in Heaven?

Published: August 28, 2014

“When celebrities publicly endorse political parties, they can end up denting the reputation not only of the party they support, but their own standing as well.”

What’s your reaction when you see celebrities rubbing shoulders with political leaders? Are you left feeling inspired, or reaching for a sick bucket? An interesting piece of research on this very subject has been making the news this week. Research in The Times found that when celebrities publicly endorse political parties, they can end up denting the reputation not only of the party they support, but their own standing as well.

The study was completed by Professor Anthony Nownes at the University of Tennessee. He focused on the impact of support by former Friends actress Jennifer Aniston for the Democrat Party, and NFL star Peyton Manning’s backing of the Republicans. What he found was a prime example of a phenomenon dreaded by all brands: negative association. If voters have a negative view of a particular party, their opinion of any celebrity endorsing that party will fall. Likewise, parties could see support fall if a controversial celebrity decides to publicly back them.

There are countless examples of political parties using famous songs at events or on videos, or of actors joining politicians on our TV screens. The question this research begs, then, is why do it?

According to Linstock Associate Dr Simon Moore, Director at researchers and consultants Innovation Bubble, there is sound psychological theory behind it. There are two ways for parties to attract voters: the first is to use facts, figures and well-constructed arguments to persuade people who actually care about politics and policies.

However, only a minority of the population have an active vested interested in the intricacies of political science. The vast majority are more persuaded by secondary factors, a route to persuasion known as ‘the peripheral route’. These factors could be the colour of the political party, how attractive the party leader is, how eloquently or plainly they speak – or their association with the popularity, attractiveness or coolness of a particular celebrity.

In Simon’s words, though, this technique is “a double edged weapon”, and it goes back to the findings of this week’s research. For me, it all comes down to the shaky phenomenon that is popular opinion, and how prone it is to volatile change. For example, who’d have predicted that Gary Barlow, the squeaky clean former lead singer of Take That, would become a toxic association for the Conservatives?

Falls from popular grace among celebrities and politicians are regular occurrences. This research is a timely reminder for any brand strategist or communications professional that while they can be a hugely potent tactic, that must be weighed against the risk of it all going sour.

Tom Yazdi
Senior Consultant

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail (not published) *

Comment

* Required field

Blog: PR Professionals Must Maintain A Leading Role

“We need to modernise and adapt to new digital trends, including measuring impact in real-time, but PR must stay true to its roots.”

Buzzword bingo was in full effect at the PRCA’s annual conference at BAFTA this year. Transparency, collaboration and...

Read more

Case Study: TheCityUK

Managing the reputation of one of the UK's largest industry sectors

TheCityUK is the membership body for the UK’s financial and related professional services industry. Its membership includes...

Read more

Case Study: Grant Thornton International

“Building Thought Leadership”

International accounting and advisory company, Grant Thornton, differentiates itself as an organisation that works with dynamic...

Read more

Case Study: British Gas

“Energy efficiency in social housing: making the green deal work”

British Gas is the UK’s leading energy and home services provider. Local authority and housing association decision makers...

Read more

Newswire: Linstock gets first prize!

“Linstock and UK Community Foundations won Not for Profit Campaign of the Year 2013 Award at Golden Hedgehogs!”

We’re proud to announce that Linstock Communications and our client UK Community Foundations have been awarded the Golden...

Read more

Blog: Typologies: Melancholic May Versus Choleric Boris

“With typologies becoming increasingly popular in business literature, let's investigate why and whether such conceptual frameworks can always be trusted.”

Apply the four temperaments typology to big names in Brexit and you might go with Phlegmatic Phil, Melancholic May and Choleric...

Read more