PR Professionals Must Maintain A Leading Role

Published: September 28, 2017

“We need to modernise and adapt to new digital trends, including measuring impact in real-time, but PR must stay true to its roots.”

Buzzword bingo was in full effect at the PRCA’s annual conference at BAFTA this year. Transparency, collaboration and authenticity enjoyed regular call-outs during a day dedicated to the importance of communication in uncertain and turbulent times.

Despite being given a slot just before the end credits, one speaker gave a short, impassioned speech about why PR should retain a leading role.

Alan VanderMolen of Seattle-based WE Communications argued that, in the rush for budget, PR is “…over-indexing towards marketing.” Essentially, in the belief that the marketing department holds the biggest slice of the communications budget, PR professionals are in danger of losing sight of their value by claiming to be, or even becoming, generalists.

Yes, we need to modernise and adapt to new digital trends, including measuring impact in real-time, but PR must stay true to its roots for at least two key reasons:

1. We understand the sensibilities of earned media – primarily press coverage. Modern communications programmes need to include owned and paid media, too. But fail to take account of the likely response of professional journalists, and organisations run the risk of producing content on complex issues that could incur reputational damage.

2. We know how to secure 3rd party validation. PR professionals are adept at informing and engaging potential influencers in a balanced manner. We’re used to managing complex relationships, listening closely to audience concerns and presenting information in a way that encourages endorsement.

Underpinning the two points is an understanding that communicators have an acute sense of the likely intellectual and, crucially, emotional response to content. We’re sensitive to human behaviour and, based on experience, can often anticipate negative reactions to a story.

The contention is that, had PR professionals been consulted early in the planning process, Pepsi wouldn’t have used Kendall Jenner to claim that a can of fizzy drink can improve US race relations (reports this week suggest the US CEO still doesn’t understand why the ad was in poor taste). The team behind Unilever’s brand Dove may have also thought twice before launching different shaped bottles to celebrate its ‘Real Beauty’ campaign.

We also have an innate ability for storytelling. Again, engage us at the start and we’ll be able to tease out the most resonant parts.

That’s not to say PR professionals always get it right (Bell Pottinger anyone?), just that we have a unique set of skills that needs to be brought to the forefront of communications campaigns. Generalist marketers may be in fashion, but every team needs specialists with deep knowledge, too.

Simon Maule
Director
Linstock Communications

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail (not published) *

Comment

* Required field

Blog: Beyond a Buzzword

“The Purpose of Thought Leadership research evolves, revealing notable changes in purpose: from raising brand awareness to leading industry agenda.”

First popularised more than 30 years ago, thought leadership has become a mainstream communications activity. A cursory search on...

Read more

Case Study: British Gas

“Energy efficiency in social housing: making the green deal work”

British Gas is the UK’s leading energy and home services provider. Local authority and housing association decision makers...

Read more

Newswire: Linstock gets first prize!

“Linstock and UK Community Foundations won Not for Profit Campaign of the Year 2013 Award at Golden Hedgehogs!”

We’re proud to announce that Linstock Communications and our client UK Community Foundations have been awarded the Golden...

Read more

Case Study: Grant Thornton International

“Building Thought Leadership”

International accounting and advisory company, Grant Thornton, differentiates itself as an organisation that works with dynamic...

Read more

Blog: Typologies: Melancholic May Versus Choleric Boris

“With typologies becoming increasingly popular in business literature, let's investigate why and whether such conceptual frameworks can always be trusted.”

Apply the four temperaments typology to big names in Brexit and you might go with Phlegmatic Phil, Melancholic May and Choleric...

Read more

Case Study: TheCityUK

Managing the reputation of one of the UK's largest industry sectors

TheCityUK is the membership body for the UK’s financial and related professional services industry. Its membership includes...

Read more